4QGF | pdb_00004qgf

S.aureus TMK in complex with the potent inhibitor compound 38, 2-(3-CHLOROPHENOXY)-3-METHOXY-4-{(1R)-1-[(3S)-3-(5-METHYL-2,4-DIOXO-3,4-DIHYDROPYRIMIDIN-1(2H)-YL)PIPERIDIN-1-YL]PROPYL}BENZOIC ACID

X-RAY DIFFRACTION

---

Crystallization

Crystalization Experiments
ID	Method	pH	Temperature	Details
1	VAPOR DIFFUSION, SITTING DROP		293	To obtain the inhibitor bound crystal form of TMK-S.aureus crystals were initially grown in the absence of compound using the sitting drop method at 293 K with a reservoir solution of 100 mM PCPT (propionate-cacodylate-bistris propane buffer) pH 7-8, 21-24% PEG 3350, 200 mM Mg2Cl using 1:1 protein:reservoir solution with the protein solution at 13 mg/mL. Crystals were harvested and soaked overnight in a solution containing 100 mM PCPT, 35% PEG 3350, 200 mM Mg2Cl and 1-2 mM or compound from a 100 mM DMSO stock. After soaking the crystals were cryoprotected by soaking for 15 minutes in compound-soak solution supplemented with 20% ethylene glycol., VAPOR DIFFUSION, SITTING DROP

Crystal Properties
Matthews coefficient	Solvent content
2.11	41.8

Crystal Data

Unit Cell
Length ( Å )	Angle ( ˚ )
a = 46.188	α = 90
b = 90.557	β = 101.92
c = 48.448	γ = 90

Symmetry
Space Group	P 1 21 1

Diffraction

Diffraction Experiment
ID #	Crystal ID	Scattering Type	Data Collection Temperature	Detector	Detector Type	Details	Collection Date	Monochromator	Protocol
1	1	x-ray	140	CCD	RIGAKU SATURN 944+	monochrom.	2010-08-17		SINGLE WAVELENGTH

Radiation Source
ID #	Source	Type	Wavelength List	Synchrotron Site	Beamline
1	ROTATING ANODE	RIGAKU FR-E+ SUPERBRIGHT	1.54

Data Collection

Overall
ID #	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Percent Possible (Observed)	R Sym I (Observed)	Net I Over Average Sigma (I)	Redundancy	Number Reflections (All)	Number Reflections (Observed)	Observed Criterion Sigma (F)	Observed Criterion Sigma (I)	B (Isotropic) From Wilson Plot
1	1.827	90.557	94.3	0.052	14.3	3.3	32586	32586			21.55

Highest Resolution Shell
ID #	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Percent Possible (All)	Percent Possible (Observed)	R Merge I (Observed)	R-Sym I (Observed)	Mean I Over Sigma (Observed)	Redundancy	Number Unique Reflections (All)
1	1.83	1.93	72		0.481	0.481	1.5	2	3640

Refinement

Statistics
Diffraction ID	Structure Solution Method	Cross Validation method	Resolution (High)	Resolution (Low)	Number Reflections (All)	Number Reflections (Observed)	Number Reflections (R-Free)	Percent Reflections (Observed)	R-Factor (Observed)	R-Work (Depositor)	R-Work (DCC)	R-Free (Depositor)	R-Free (DCC)	R-Free Selection Details	Mean Isotropic B
X-RAY DIFFRACTION	MOLECULAR REPLACEMENT	THROUGHOUT	1.83	32.94	34401	32444	1648	94.31	0.169	0.1671	0.1722	0.2032	0.209	RANDOM	24.8

Temperature Factor Modeling
Anisotropic B[1][1]	Anisotropic B[1][2]	Anisotropic B[1][3]	Anisotropic B[2][2]	Anisotropic B[2][3]	Anisotropic B[3][3]
-3.4771		-8.1977	5.4807		-2.0036

RMS Deviations
Key	Refinement Restraint Deviation
t_other_torsion	16.26
t_omega_torsion	3.34
t_angle_deg	1.02
t_bond_d	0.01
t_dihedral_angle_d
t_trig_c_planes
t_gen_planes
t_it
t_nbd
t_improper_torsion
t_pseud_angle
t_chiral_improper_torsion
t_sum_occupancies
t_utility_distance
t_utility_angle
t_utility_torsion
t_ideal_dist_contact

Non-Hydrogen Atoms Used in Refinement
Non-Hydrogen Atoms	Number
Protein Atoms	3036
Nucleic Acid Atoms
Solvent Atoms	299
Heterogen Atoms	74

Software

Software
Software Name	Purpose
SCALA	data scaling
AMoRE	phasing
BUSTER-TNT	refinement
PDB_EXTRACT	data extraction
JDirector	data collection
PROCESS	data reduction
BUSTER	refinement