1FRP

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF FRUCTOSE-1,6-BISPHOSPHATASE COMPLEXED WITH FRUCTOSE-2,6-BISPHOSPHATE, AMP AND ZN2+ AT 2.0 ANGSTROMS RESOLUTION. ASPECTS OF SYNERGISM BETWEEN INHIBITORS


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.189 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.189 (Depositor) 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted AMPClick on this verticalbar to view detailsBest fitted FDPClick on this verticalbar to view details

This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Crystal structure of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase complexed with fructose 2,6-bisphosphate, AMP, and Zn2+ at 2.0-A resolution: aspects of synergism between inhibitors.

Xue, Y.Huang, S.Liang, J.Y.Zhang, Y.Lipscomb, W.N.

(1994) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 12482-12486

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.26.12482
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1FRP

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The crystal structure of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (Fru-1,6-Pase; EC 3.1.3.11) complexed with Zn2+ and two allosteric regulators, AMP and fructose 2,6-bisphosphate (Fru-2,6-P2) has been determined at 2.0-A resolution. In the refined model, the crystallographic R factor is 0.189 with rms deviations of 0.014 A and 2.8 degrees from ideal geometries for bond lengths and bond angles, respectively. A 15 degrees rotation is observed between the upper dimer C1C2 and the lower dimer C3C4 relative to the R-form structure (fructose 6-phosphate complex), consistent with that expected from a T-form structure. The major difference between the structure of the previously determined Fru-2,6-P2 complex (R form) and that of the current quaternary T-form complex lies in the active site domain. A zinc binding site distinct from the three binding sites established earlier was identified within each monomer. Helix H4 (residues 123-127) was found to be better defined than in previously studied ligated Fru-1,6-Pase structures. Interactions between monomers in the active site domain were found involving H4 residues from one monomer and residues Tyr-258 and Arg-243 from the adjacent monomer. Cooperativity between AMP and Fru-2,6-P2 in signal transmission probably involves the following features: an AMP site, the adjacent B3 strand (residues 113-118), the metal site, the immediate active site, the short helix H4 (residues 123-127), and Tyr-258 and Arg-243 from the adjacent monomer within the upper (or lower) dimer. The closest distance between the immediate active site and that on the adjacent monomer is only 5 A. Thus, the involvement of H4 in signal transmission adds another important pathway to the scheme of the allosteric mechanism of Fru-1,6-Pase.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Gibbs Chemical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
FRUCTOSE 1,6-BISPHOSPHATASE
A, B
335Sus scrofaMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.1.3.11
UniProt
Find proteins for P00636 (Sus scrofa)
Explore P00636 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00636
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00636
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Binding Affinity Annotations 
IDSourceBinding Affinity
AMP BindingDB:  1FRP IC50: min: 140, max: 9800 (nM) from 10 assay(s)
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Work:  0.189 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.189 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 21 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 60.95α = 90
b = 166.3β = 90
c = 80γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
X-PLORmodel building
X-PLORrefinement
X-PLORphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted AMPClick on this verticalbar to view detailsBest fitted FDPClick on this verticalbar to view details

Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 1994-11-30
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-03
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Derived calculations, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2020-07-29
    Type: Remediation
    Reason: Carbohydrate remediation
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Other, Structure summary
  • Version 1.4: 2024-02-07
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Structure summary