5LRL

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF HSP90 IN COMPLEX WITH A003492875


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.33 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.189 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.174 (Depositor), 0.170 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.175 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted 73SClick on this verticalbar to view details

This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Estimation of Protein-Ligand Unbinding Kinetics Using Non-Equilibrium Targeted Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Wolf, S.Amaral, M.Lowinski, M.Vallee, F.Musil, D.Guldenhaupt, J.Dreyer, M.K.Bomke, J.Frech, M.Schlitter, J.Gerwert, K.

(2019) J Chem Inf Model 59: 5135-5147

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00592
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    5LRL

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    We here report on nonequilibrium targeted molecular dynamics simulations as a tool for the estimation of protein-ligand unbinding kinetics. Correlating simulations with experimental data from SPR kinetics measurements and X-ray crystallography on two small molecule compound libraries bound to the N-terminal domain of the chaperone Hsp90, we show that the mean nonequilibrium work computed in an ensemble of trajectories of enforced ligand unbinding is a promising predictor for ligand unbinding rates. We furthermore investigate the molecular basis determining unbinding rates within the compound libraries. We propose ligand conformational changes and protein-ligand nonbonded interactions to impact on unbinding rates. Ligands may remain longer at the protein if they exhibit strong electrostatic and/or van der Waals interactions with the target. In the case of ligands with a rigid chemical scaffold that exhibit longer residence times, transient electrostatic interactions with the protein appear to facilitate unbinding. Our results imply that understanding the unbinding pathway and the protein-ligand interactions along this path is crucial for the prediction of small molecule ligands with defined unbinding kinetics.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biophysics , Ruhr-University Bochum , 44780 Bochum , Germany.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha208Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: HSP90AA1HSP90AHSPC1HSPCA
EC: 3.6.4.10
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for P07900 (Homo sapiens)
Explore P07900 
Go to UniProtKB:  P07900
PHAROS:  P07900
GTEx:  ENSG00000080824 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP07900
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
73S
Query on 73S

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]2-azanyl-5-chloranyl-~{N}-[(9~{R})-4-(1~{H}-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridin-2-yl)-9~{H}-fluoren-9-yl]pyrimidine-4-carboxamide
C24 H16 Cl N7 O
RCHSWIOHLXMCES-HXUWFJFHSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.33 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.189 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.174 (Depositor), 0.170 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.175 (Depositor) 
Space Group: I 2 2 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 66.46α = 90
b = 90.7β = 90
c = 98.53γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
BUSTERrefinement
XDSdata reduction
Aimlessdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted 73SClick on this verticalbar to view details

Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2017-08-23
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2019-06-12
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Structure summary
  • Version 1.2: 2021-08-11
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2024-01-10
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description