9DEC | pdb_00009dec

Crystal Structure of D9-threaded


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.04 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.278 (Depositor), 0.278 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.222 (Depositor), 0.222 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.228 (Depositor) 

Starting Model: in silico
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 1.0 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Massively parallel assessment of designed protein solution properties using mass spectrometry and peptide barcoding.

Feldman, D.Sims, J.N.Li, X.Johnson, R.Gerben, S.Kim, D.E.Richardson, C.Koepnick, B.Eisenach, H.Hicks, D.R.Yang, E.C.Wicky, B.I.M.Milles, L.F.Bera, A.K.Kang, A.Brackenbrough, E.Joyce, E.Sankaran, B.Lubner, J.M.Goreshnik, I.Vafeados, D.Allen, A.Stewart, L.MacCoss, M.J.Baker, D.

(2025) bioRxiv 

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.24.639402
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    8VEA, 9DE9, 9DEA, 9DEB, 9DEC

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Library screening and selection methods can determine the binding activities of individual members of large protein libraries given a physical link between protein and nucleotide sequence, which enables identification of functional molecules by DNA sequencing. However, the solution properties of individual protein molecules cannot be probed using such approaches because they are completely altered by DNA attachment. Mass spectrometry enables parallel evaluation of protein properties amenable to physical fractionation such as solubility and oligomeric state, but current approaches are limited to libraries of 1,000 or fewer proteins. Here, we improved mass spectrometry barcoding by co-synthesizing proteins with barcodes optimized to be highly multiplexable and minimally perturbative, scaling to libraries of >5,000 proteins. We use these barcodes together with mass spectrometry to assay the solution behavior of libraries of de novo -designed monomeric scaffolds, oligomers, binding proteins and nanocages, rapidly identifying design failure modes and successes.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
D9-threaded
A, B, C
83synthetic constructMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.04 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.278 (Depositor), 0.278 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.222 (Depositor), 0.222 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.228 (Depositor) 
Space Group: I 2 2 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 67.973α = 90
b = 69.276β = 90
c = 84.467γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
XDSdata reduction
XSCALEdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)United States--

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2025-03-26
    Type: Initial release