3PVK

Secreted aspartic protease 2 in complex with benzamidine


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.27 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.184 
  • R-Value Work: 0.168 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.169 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


This is version 2.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Experimental and computational active site mapping as a starting point to fragment-based lead discovery.

Behnen, J.Koster, H.Neudert, G.Craan, T.Heine, A.Klebe, G.

(2012) ChemMedChem 7: 248-261

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201100490
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3MS3, 3MSA, 3MSF, 3MSN, 3N21, 3N4A, 3N9W, 3NN7, 3NX8, 3PCZ, 3PRS, 3PVK, 3PWW

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Small highly soluble probe molecules such as aniline, urea, N-methylurea, 2-bromoacetate, 1,2-propanediol, nitrous oxide, benzamidine, and phenol were soaked into crystals of various proteins to map their binding pockets and to detect hot spots of binding with respect to hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties. The selected probe molecules were first tested at the zinc protease thermolysin. They were then applied to a wider range of proteins such as protein kinase A, D-xylose isomerase, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol synthase, endothiapepsin, and secreted aspartic protease 2. The crystal structures obtained clearly show that the probe molecules populate the protein binding pockets in an ordered fashion. The thus characterized, experimentally observed hot spots of binding were subjected to computational active site mapping using HotspotsX. This approach uses knowledge-based pair potentials to detect favorable binding positions for various atom types. Good agreement between the in silico hot spot predictions and the experimentally observed positions of the polar hydrogen bond forming functional groups and hydrophobic portions was obtained. Finally, we compared the observed poses of the small-molecule probes with those of much larger structurally related ligands. They coincide remarkably well with the larger ligands, considering their spatial orientation and the experienced interaction patterns. This observation confirms the fundamental hypothesis of fragment-based lead discovery: that binding poses, even of very small molecular probes, do not significantly deviate or move once a ligand is grown further into the binding site. This underscores the fact that these probes populate given hot spots and can be regarded as relevant seeds for further design.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps University Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032 Marburg, Germany.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Candidapepsin-2342Candida albicansMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.4.23.24
UniProt
Find proteins for P0CS83 (Candida albicans)
Explore P0CS83 
Go to UniProtKB:  P0CS83
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP0CS83
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.27 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.184 
  • R-Value Work: 0.168 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.169 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 49.38α = 90
b = 63.58β = 90
c = 98.41γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
MAR345dtbdata collection
PHASERphasing
PHENIXrefinement
HKL-2000data reduction
HKL-2000data scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2011-12-07
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2012-01-18
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2012-02-15
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 2.0: 2021-08-04
    Changes: Atomic model, Data collection, Derived calculations, Non-polymer description, Structure summary
  • Version 2.1: 2023-09-06
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description
  • Version 2.2: 2024-10-30
    Changes: Structure summary