3PWW

Endothiapepsin in complex with saquinavir


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.22 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.178 
  • R-Value Work: 0.162 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.163 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Experimental and computational active site mapping as a starting point to fragment-based lead discovery.

Behnen, J.Koster, H.Neudert, G.Craan, T.Heine, A.Klebe, G.

(2012) ChemMedChem 7: 248-261

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201100490
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3MS3, 3MSA, 3MSF, 3MSN, 3N21, 3N4A, 3N9W, 3NN7, 3NX8, 3PCZ, 3PRS, 3PVK, 3PWW

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Small highly soluble probe molecules such as aniline, urea, N-methylurea, 2-bromoacetate, 1,2-propanediol, nitrous oxide, benzamidine, and phenol were soaked into crystals of various proteins to map their binding pockets and to detect hot spots of binding with respect to hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties. The selected probe molecules were first tested at the zinc protease thermolysin. They were then applied to a wider range of proteins such as protein kinase A, D-xylose isomerase, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol synthase, endothiapepsin, and secreted aspartic protease 2. The crystal structures obtained clearly show that the probe molecules populate the protein binding pockets in an ordered fashion. The thus characterized, experimentally observed hot spots of binding were subjected to computational active site mapping using HotspotsX. This approach uses knowledge-based pair potentials to detect favorable binding positions for various atom types. Good agreement between the in silico hot spot predictions and the experimentally observed positions of the polar hydrogen bond forming functional groups and hydrophobic portions was obtained. Finally, we compared the observed poses of the small-molecule probes with those of much larger structurally related ligands. They coincide remarkably well with the larger ligands, considering their spatial orientation and the experienced interaction patterns. This observation confirms the fundamental hypothesis of fragment-based lead discovery: that binding poses, even of very small molecular probes, do not significantly deviate or move once a ligand is grown further into the binding site. This underscores the fact that these probes populate given hot spots and can be regarded as relevant seeds for further design.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps University Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032 Marburg, Germany.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Endothiapepsin330Cryphonectria parasiticaMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.4.23.22
UniProt
Find proteins for P11838 (Cryphonectria parasitica)
Explore P11838 
Go to UniProtKB:  P11838
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP11838
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 2 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
ROC
Query on ROC

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A](2S)-N-[(2S,3R)-4-[(2S,3S,4aS,8aS)-3-(tert-butylcarbamoyl)-3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1H-isoquinolin-2-yl]-3-hydroxy-1 -phenyl-butan-2-yl]-2-(quinolin-2-ylcarbonylamino)butanediamide
C38 H50 N6 O5
QWAXKHKRTORLEM-UGJKXSETSA-N
GOL
Query on GOL

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
C [auth A]GLYCEROL
C3 H8 O3
PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Binding Affinity Annotations 
IDSourceBinding Affinity
ROC PDBBind:  3PWW Ki: 48 (nM) from 1 assay(s)
Biologically Interesting Molecules (External Reference) 1 Unique
Entity ID: 2
IDChains NameType/Class2D Diagram3D Interactions
PRD_000454 (ROC)
Query on PRD_000454
B [auth A]SaquinavirPeptide-like / Inhibitor
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.22 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.178 
  • R-Value Work: 0.162 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.163 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 45.436α = 90
b = 73.039β = 109.71
c = 52.92γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
MAR345dtbdata collection
PHASERphasing
PHENIXrefinement
HKL-2000data reduction
HKL-2000data scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2011-12-14
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2012-02-08
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2012-12-12
    Changes: Other
  • Version 1.3: 2023-09-13
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description, Structure summary
  • Version 1.4: 2024-10-30
    Changes: Structure summary